What is the basis of our life/partnership choices? Should be let moral/ethical - mostly the social considerations - to take over our (whatever vague) temptation of trying-tasting-curiosity towards a new and next step?
Age, gender, social limits are importantly enough - and powerful enough - to stop us make the choices we and only we - in the loneliness of the meeting between our thoughts and desires ? We want to fill our lives, to have a certain feeling of accomplishment. But, are we resourceful enough to do it with nothing more nothing less than accessing our inner resources?
Feelings are irrational and hard to explain. Our thoughts might be feed by the desires of irrationality.
In what respects philosophy and ethics are helpful in the genesis of our choices ? But not in the post-hoc analysis of the choices we already made.
Do we need to apologize for our personal decisions, even these decisions do confront the usual social stereotypes?
Does it means that by fully assuming our decisions we are fully aware of the importance of being the part and the solution of our decisions? The ethnical relief included.
The moral discussions do not need answers, but an endless row of questions. Just a couple of them inspired by Alexander McCall Smith's book.
No comments:
Post a Comment