After reading several (meaning good dozen) of books about Hasidism, one may realize after a short while that the content is becoming repetitive. There are inevitably information about the history of the movement, outlines of the founders and famous dynasties (Satmer and Chabad especially, as they are by far the most successful; too much Chabad though in my humble opinion). Some unique information revealed in well-kept archives of various groups is what differentiates one book from the other.
Historical Atlas of Hasidism has a completely different type of perspective. It has maps focused on various dynamics and trends, from the structure of the courts to the circulation of petitions and migrations and resettlements after WWII.
'Hasidism has been conditioned by the spatial characteristics of the movement, not only in its social organization, but also in its spiritual life, type of religious leadership, or cultural articulation. And it is possible to capture this dimension of Hasidism with maps'. Such an approach is a welcomed changed of shift which may help seize trends and mentality patterns, as well as aspects of the material culture that previous studies neglected or were unable to understand.
Rightly, the author mentions among the limitations of the research in this field: the predominance of intellectual history which neglects economic, social, cultural or political histories; an inadequate use of sources of non-Hasidic origin (particularly if not in Hebrew or Yiddish); a chronological focus on the early stages of the movement; esentialist and ahistorical approaches when it comes to what is and what is not Hasidism.
The focus on geography and classifications in general may lead to uncovering very interesting aspects on Hasidic life in Central and Eastern Europe but also allows regional identifications of trends and mentalities.
Compared to the richness of information contained in the maps, the texts are not necessarily outstanding and repeat basic information about the various movements and dynasties found elsewhere. In one particular case when mentioning the 'Romanian features' - not detailed - of dynasties like Nadvorna or Vizhnitz - both named for localities that actually do not belong necessarily to the Romanian-administrative space, the author omits completely to offer well-deserved explanations of any kind.
Personally, this book helped me a lot in my future researches on Hasidism and hopefully will be able to go more into depth research.
No comments:
Post a Comment