Wednesday 29 April 2009

Moot, 4chan Founder, Takes Time 100 Poll


The Wall Street Journal
April 27

The twentysomething founder of 4chan.org won Time’s title of “World’s Most Influential Person” despite accusations that the meme site’s fans hacked the online poll.

warren_D_20090427134514.jpgGetty Images
Rick Warren, who came in No. 3 on Time’s “World’s Most Influential People” list.

The founder, Christopher Poole, also known as “moot,” received 16.8 million votes. Malaysian politician Anwar Ibrahim was a distant runner up, with 2.3 million votes, followed by evangelist Rick Warren with 1.9 million. The rest of the top 10 included Taliban leader Baitullah Mehsud, Google.org head Larry Brilliant, Attorney General Eric Holder, Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, basketball star Kobe Bryant and Bolivian president Evo Morales.

While 4chan is one of the most popular sites for kick-starting viral videos and online trends like Rickrolling, with a self-proclaimed 3 million unique visitors a month, it’s unlikely that Mr. Poole tops the list of influential people in the lives of 16 million Time magazine readers.

It seems that 4chan fans managed to hack Time’s poll, as described by Paul Lamere, who writes software for Apple and was evidently invited to participate in a scheme to stuff the ballot box with millions of autovotes.

Time.com editor Josh Tyrangiel says the hack quickly became obvious, and while they tried to thwart it by removing illegitimate votes and using a captcha system, the autovoting persisted. “Which proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that [moot] is the most influential person in the world,” he jokes.

More than 100 comments arrived in response to Mr. Lamere’s blog post about the hack. “This is utterly artistic. While I certianly [sic] would not have voted for moot before this, I will be doing so now. Repeatedly,” wrote user GBM. “4chan really does own the internet,” wrote John.

Another commenter, xhurricane, had a more cynical take. “TIME.com probably doesn’t have a vested interest in canceling those bot votes - since they are now counting that as user activity and will be able to justify higher ad rates to their adverts. Maybe, just maybe, TIME.com got the upper hand in this one and leveraged the power of the rabid fans to artificially increase their value!”

Mr. Tyrangiel says people have asked him if he’s angry about the poll getting hacked, but he thinks it’s a testament to what the Web is all about — that is, who has the most influence or motivation to get so many votes. “As it turns out, Vladimir Putin’s people weren’t as motivated, even though he has more of them, and he probably has greater sway,” he says.

Last year’s poll is an indication of how scientific the results are: Political satirist Stephen Colbert and Korean pop singer Rain topped the list. They may not be as influential as world leaders, but both have hordes of enthusiastic followers.

“We’ll try to secure it as best we can,” Mr. Tyrangiel says of future Time polls, though he adds that he and his staff only have a limited amount of time to isolate bots. In the case of hackers, he says, “it appears that there’s no limit to how much leisure time some people have.”


In fact, yes, he won. The problem is with those who take such polls as granted and even more, shape their value systems according to such evaluations.

Monday 27 April 2009

Bob Dylan at the 02 Arena, SE10



The Times on-line

April 27

Bob Dylan does not make life easy for his fans. He might be the only performer who fills his set lists with crowd pleasers while doing everything possible not to please the crowd. This two-hour concert at the cavernous O2 stadium was no exception. Immobile behind a little keyboard to the side of the stage, his face shadowed by the brim of a fedora, Dylan treated his adoring followers with the disdain of a haughty lover. He barely acknowledged their presence. He wilfully contorted his legacy with hard-to-recognise versions of his most famous songs. He started early (8pm) and finished early, as if he had better places to be. And he left his audience wanting more than he was prepared to give.

Having been pretty much constantly on tour since 1974, Dylan has grounded his concerts in that timeworn musical style with no beginning or end: bar-room blues. As his band launched into a long, chugging version of Maggie's Farm, it became apparent that Dylan was stitching his own material into the wider fabric of American music. It took a long time to work out that an extended electric blues jam was in fact The Times They Are a- Changin.' On The Chimes of Freedom, he gruffly raised the inflection of each line in a way that made him sound like a malevolent imp. Dylan is the Rumpelstiltskin of popular culture, cackling at his own cleverness and ability to keep everyone guessing. It's a bizarre and unique spectacle. This is not a rock show, given the lack of theatrics, nor does it have the intimacy of an evening with a singer-songwriter, as Dylan sings in a way that makes his words hard to decipher. It's more like a brief stop on a journey that presumably only ends when he either dies or gets too old to keep on touring.

Songs from the much lauded Modern Times featured heavily, but there was nothing from his masterpieces Blood on the Tracks or Desire or, more surprisingly, from his just-released Together Through Life. An atypically faithful version of Like a Rolling Stone, one of the greatest songs written, finished the main set. When Dylan spoke in order to introduce the band, the crowd went wild. Then, after a short encore that included All Along the Watchtower and Blowin' in the Wind, the band shuffled off. Dylan's genius is such that he cannot help be compelling, but as a performer he is wilfully frustrating.

Saturday 25 April 2009

Jewish intelligence, Jewish genes, and Jewish values.



William Saletan
Slate

Are Jews a race? Is Jewish intelligence genetic?

If these notions make you cringe, you're not alone. Many non-Jews find them offensive. Actually, scratch that. I have no idea whether non-Jews find them offensive. But I imagine that they do, which is why Jews like me wince at any suggestion of Jewish genetic superiority. We don't even want to talk about it.

Actually, a bunch of us did talk about it, three days ago at a forum at the American Enterprise Institute. The main speaker was Jon Entine, an AEI fellow and author of a new book, Abraham's Children: Race, Identity, and the DNA of the Chosen People. He was joined by fellow AEI scholar Charles Murray and by Laurie Zoloth, a bioethicist at Northwestern University. Entine and Zoloth are Jewish. Murray isn't but talks as though he wishes he were. "One of my thesis advisers at MIT was a Sephardic Jew," he announced proudly, turning the old "some of my best friends" cliché upside down.

Entine laid out the data. The average IQ of Ashkenazi Jews is 107 to 115, well above the human average of 100. This gap and the genetic theories surrounding it stirred discomfort in the room. Zoloth, speaking for many liberals, recalled a family member's revulsion at the idea of a Jewish race. Judaism is about faith and values, she argued. To reduce it to biology is to make it exclusive, denying its openness to all. Worse, to suggest that Jews are genetically smart is to imply that non-Jews are inherently inferior, in violation of Jewish commitments to equality and compassion. My friend Dana Milbank, who's a better (if I may use that word) Jew than I am, watched the discussion, went back to his office, and wrote a column in the Washington Post poking fun at all the talk of superior Jewish intellect. The column, as usual, was really smart.

But what if Judaism as a genetic inheritance is compatible with Judaism as a cultural inheritance? And what if the genes that make Jews smart also make them sick? If one kind of superiority comes at the price of another kind of inferiority, and if the transmission of Jewish values drives the transmission of Jewish genes, does that make the genetics and the superiority easier to swallow?

Apparently so.

According to Entine, the rate of Jewish "outbreeding"—procreating with non-Jews—is half a percent. That's the lowest rate of any population in the world today. What drives this phenomenon? Culture. Ten years ago, my childless Orthodox uncle came up to me and said, "I hear you're dating a Jewish girl." When I replied in the affirmative, he added, "If you marry her, I'll come to the wedding." That was pretty much the whole conversation. A year and a half later, he was at my wedding. Today, he's got a grandniece and grandnephew living in my house. I'd like to think he had no influence, but maybe I'm kidding myself. Explicitly and implicitly, Jews have been getting this message for millennia. As Murray pointed out, the Bible is full of instructions to marry within the faith.

A culture that trains its young people to procreate only with one another becomes, over time, a genetically distinct population. And if that culture glorifies intelligence to such a degree that it drives less intelligent people out of the community—or prevents them from attracting mates—it becomes an IQ machine. Cultural selection replaces natural selection. For example, Jews have long emphasized male literacy. For this reason, Murray argued, anyone who was Jewish and stupid 2,000 years ago found "it was a lot easier to be a Christian." Entine called this kind of process a "bio-cultural feedback loop."

The theory still sounds arrogant, until you hear the IQ machine's possible costs. Some scholars now hypothesize that the genes that make Jews smart also give some of them nasty diseases such as Tay-Sachs. Entine finds this plausible. He pointed out that some genes associated with brain growth are also associated with breast cancer, including in his own family. During the question-and-answer session, someone brought up another tradeoff: Supposedly, Jews are deficient in visio-spatial skills, possibly because their brains allot extra space for verbal intelligence. That might explain the average Ashkenazi Jewish score of 122 on verbal IQ tests.

Pondering these nuances and tradeoffs, Zoloth reconsidered her aversion to the idea of Jewish genes and Jewish intelligence. What should we do, she wondered, if we find genes that predispose children both to genius and to early death? And should Jewish biological differences be minimized if they're expressions of—and vehicles for—Judaism as a value system?

Zoloth didn't have answers to those questions. Neither do I. Part of being Jewish, after all, is talking in questions more than answers. Whether that habit is cultural or biological, I don't know. But this much I can tell you: I walked out of the AEI conference room that day with a cut on my nose because, in an attempt to pick something up off the floor, I whacked my face on the chair in front of me. Probably I'm just a moron. But maybe visio-spatial deficiency really is a sign of intelligence, in which case, I'd like to thank my ancestors for making the trade. Including my uncle, who, come to think of it, may not be childless after all.

William Saletan is Slate's national correspondent and author of Bearing Right: How Conservatives Won the Abortion War.

Article URL: http://www.slate.com/id/2177228/

Thursday 23 April 2009

Exercises of style

A couple of things about my reading choices - all of them are starting with a negation: I do not usually read history novels (it is easier for me to understand history through pure historical and qualified researches, and even less the books with religious subjects. Also, I think twice before starting to read a Nobel prize in literature writer. When I see in the big libraries the rows with books and smiling pictures with big announcements: "The ... Nobel Prize Winner", I go to another section. (So, no Le Clezio for the moment). In the case of Lagerkvist's case I found the book accidentally on a shelf in a friend's library, opened and read a couple of paragraphs. Very good and even brilliant descriptions which encouraged me to read further. But I missed the plot, the interpretation and the narrative. It is nothing complicate, but simply haven't seen the intelligence of the writing, other than a certain religious interpretation. Which I could appreciate strictly from the literary quality of the words.


The rat in the book


I've heard a couple of months ago an author of children books explaining how much the market for kids is changing from a season to another, in terms of favorite animals characters. "This summer the elephants are wanted, or the rabbits, the next season the giraffes or the apes; the bears are the favorites almost all the time". Probably it is the same happening with the movies - jungle animals from Madagascar, the rats - first Ratatouille, which I saw and found full of humor, after Despereaux, which I don't but maybe I don't want to see all the rats representations in movies for children, the bees - from the Bee Movie etc. For the kids, the ingredients of the character should include a sympathetic human figure, playful and very close of a normal - and sometimes freer, because in the wild, of course - and happy kid.

As an adult, probably you wait the animal-character to be different than any human or at least to reveal hidden perceptions, perspectives and, why not, ideas. What the rat character from Firmin: Advantages of a Metropolitan Lowlife is not. Shortly, as an occurence of his rat's life, he started to live around books, ate some of them and started to read. And as his understading of human increase, an old world is about to change and even his favorite bookstore is closing the doors. Firmin is not an usual, normal, looking for knowledge kind of reader: he is reading with a passion close to multiple personality obsession, completely identifying with the book characters. You cannot shout "Firmin, c'est moi", because you cannot describe exactly what he is: a child-abused animal, a human turned by a bad fairy in a rat. And, at the end of the story, he dies. I am sure I am missing something about understanding the key-elements of successful books.

But, anyway, Sam Savage bio's is quite interesting: the beat Ph.D. in philosophy turned to a fisherman and bycicle mechanic.

And, in fact, I like books with animal characters for adults. Still looking to find at least something as lively than Paul Auster's Timbuktu.

Wednesday 22 April 2009

Permanent emergency

Instead of focusing on what should be done now and have a point, it is more useful to create a permanent state of emergency. They are always very important issues at stake, so why to do not be there. As the reservoir of emergencies - some of them real - is endless, and the disponibility for real action and involvement limited, they will be plenty of occasion to avoid responsibility.

To Tweet or Not to Tweet

I do not always agree with Maureen Dowd - mostly the political side. But I must recognize she is writing good, very good. This interview is with the founder of Twitter.
Example of exchange:

"ME: I would rather be tied up to stakes in the Kalahari Desert, have honey poured over me and red ants eat out my eyes than open a Twitter account. Is there anything you can say to change my mind?

BIZ: Well, when you do find yourself in that position, you’re gonna want Twitter. You might want to type out the message “Help.”"

Monday 20 April 2009

Holocaust survivors to light torches at Yad Vashem ceremony


At this year's official Opening Ceremony for Holocaust Martyrs' and Heroes' Remembrance Day which opens Monday evening at the Warsaw Guetto Square at Jerusalem's Yad Vashem, Holocaust survivors will light six torches as short videos of their individual testimonies will be shown on screen.

The central theme selected for this year's ceremony is Children of the Holocaust, according to a Yad Vashem statement, and the survivors lighting the torches Monday evening were all young children when World War II began.

The ceremony, which will feature speeches by President Shimon Peres and Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, memorial services by Chief Rabbis Shlomo Amar and Yonah Metzger and a 2-hour symposium entitled Through the Tears - Childhood and Youth During the Shoah - will be broadcast live on television.

These are the six survivors in the order they will appear at the traditional memorial ceremony.

Lea Paz

Lea Paz, née Weitzner, was born in 1930 in Lwow. Her father Herman, a civil judge, passed away when Lea was five, and Lea and her mother Gusta moved to the village of Kochawina to live on her grandfather's large farm.

In September 1942, Lea, Gusta and her grandmother were deported to Belzec. With rumors about the camp circulating on the train, Gusta pushed Lea out through a narrow opening in the side of the train car. Lea eventually found her way back to her grandfather and an uncle, Mundek, who had escaped the deportation. Mundek, who had lived in Mandatory Palestine but had come back to introduce his fiancée to his family and got caught in the war, was determined to save the young girl. He bought Lea false papers, and taught her Christian prayers and customs, all the while encouraging her to eventually emigrate to the Land of Israel.

Lea first lived with the Plauszewski family, and then with a relative of theirs, Stefania Gos, whose husband was a commander in the Polish underground. Her rescuers were later recognized as Righteous Among the Nations.

Just before liberation, Lea's grandfather and Mundek were turned in by one of their neighbors. After Mundek's death, the family who had hidden him, the Wohanskis (later also recognized as Righteous Among the Nations), gave Lea his two picture albums filled with photographs of Mandatory Palestine.

Lea emigrated to Palestine on an illegal immigrant ship but was arrested by the British and interned in Cyprus. During a demonstration organized by the internees in Cyprus, Lea was wounded by British police gunfire. The story was published in the Jewish press in Mandatory Palestine, thus allowing her relatives on Kibbutz Merhavia to discover that she had survived. Lea was reunited with them after she was finally allowed to immigrate into Eretz Israel. She married Ephraim, and they have two children and six grandchildren.

--------------------------------

Mirjam Schuster

Mirjam Schuster was born in 1935 in Zarojani, Moldova, to an observant Jewish family of six children. In 1941, the family was deported by Romanian soldiers and forcibly marched, together with all the Jews in the area, towards Transnistria. After more than two months of walking day and night, Mirjam and her family arrived at Balki, near the city of Bar, where thousands of Jewish prisoners were crammed into horse stables without windows or doors. The stables were terribly crowded, and rife with hunger and disease. Mirjam and her family slept on the exposed concrete floor. Her mother saw to Mirjam's needs and those of the other children, while her older sisters smuggled in food from the adjacent village.

Mirjam remembers a Jewish child named Mendele, who was smuggled into the camp by his parents. Mirjam took Mendele under her wing and protected him from other children who were bullying him. One day, the Germans found Mendele and murdered him. His horrific death left Miriam deeply scarred.

In 1944, the Soviets liberated Balki. Out of more than 10,000 inmates, only a few hundred had survived. Following liberation, the Jewish Agency placed Mirjam in a children's home. After a few months, she boarded an illegal immigrant ship, which was intercepted by the British and sent to Cyprus. Just before the establishment of the State, Mirjiam finally reached Israel's shores.

Mirjam married Moshe and has three children and eight grandchildren. After her children had grown, she began volunteering with new immigrants, helping ease their adjustment to living in Israel. Today, Mirjam is the volunteer director of the "Help for Holocaust Survivors" organization.

-----------------------------------

Solomon Feigerson

Solomon (Sjema) Feigerson was born in 1930 in Liepaja, Latvia, the middle of three sons. His older brother Hanoch was killed in June 1941, in defense of the town against the Germans. His father, Yaakov, was murdered in July 1941, and his mother and younger brother Josef were murdered at the Skede execution grounds in February 1942. Solomon escaped that and another murder operation in April by running away, despite being shot by Latvian guards.

In July 1942, the Jews of Liepaja were herded into a ghetto. Solomon lived in one room with 20 other orphaned boys. On Yom Kippur (October) 1943, the ghetto was liquidated and Solomon was deported to the Kaiserwald labor camp. There he met and bonded with Lina Goldblatt, a prisoner from Hamburg, and her daughter, Rosa. "She was like a mother to me," he recalls, "she even sewed me a shirt and a pair of pants."

In August 1944 Solomon was transferred to the Stutthof concentration camp, and in April 1945 he was put on one of four ships carrying 500 inmates, sent into the Baltic Sea to die. Solomon's ship eventually sailed into Neustadt on 3 May 1945. German sailors on the shore shot at the survivors. A British soldier found him, exhausted and ill, clutching a loaf of bread.

After the war, Solomon went to Riga. He studied engineering and started a family. While in Riga, he campaigned with Holocaust survivors and others to emigrate to Israel. He arrived in Israel in 1971 where he worked as an engineer and volunteered with a number of organizations commemorating the Holocaust and assisting survivors. He also published a book about the destruction of the Jewish community of Liepaja.

Solomon and his wife Ethel have a son and two grandchildren.

------------------------------------

Iudit Barnea and Lia Huber

Identical twin sisters Iudit Barnea and Lia Huber (nées Tchengar) were born in 1937 in the town of Şimleul Silvaniei (Szilagysomlyo), Transylvania. In 1940, Transylvania was annexed to Hungary, and in June 1942 their father Zvi was taken to a forced labor unit on the Russian front.

With the German conquest of Hungary in March 1944, the family's property and belongings were confiscated, and they were forced to wear a yellow star. In May 1944 Iudit, Lia and their mother, Miriam-Rachel, were interned in a ghetto, and the following month they were deported to Auschwitz, along with many other members of their family.

At Auschwitz, Iudit and Lia suffered the infamous medical experiments of Josef Mengele. The twins always stayed close together. Every night, their mother would sneak into their block and give them her meager portion of bread. She would also take them outside, in all weathers, to wash them and comb their hair, and thus preventing them from getting infested by lice and being doomed to the gas chambers. One day, as Mengele was experimenting on the girls, Miriam-Rachel burst into the shack and begged him to stop. In response, she was injected with a concoction that nearly killed her, and caused her permanent deafness.

In January 1945 the girls and their mother were liberated by the Red Army. They returned to Åžimleul Silvaniei, and in August 1945 they were reunited with their father, who had survived many camps. In 1960 the family immigrated to Israel. Both girls married: Lia and her husband Jean have two children and seven grandchildren; Iudit and Moshe have three children and five grandchildren.

------------------------------------

Esther Debora Reiss-Mossel

Esther Debora Reiss-Mossel, the youngest child of Josef and Elsa, was born in 1938 in Heiloo, Holland to a well-known Zionist family. In 1942, her parents Josef and Elsa entrusted her to their nanny's family, but Esther refused to stay and returned home.

During the razzia (raid) of 26 May 1943 the family was sent to the Westerbork transit camp. After being hospitalized for many weeks with a number of childhood diseases, Esther went to the camp nursery, where she recalls learning Jewish and Zionist songs. On 19 January 1944 the family of five - including Esther's brother Benjamin (Ben) and sister Yetty (Yael) - was sent to Bergen-Belsen, which her father believed was a stop on the way to Eretz Israel. When her parents caught typhus, Esther was sent to an orphanage set up by Henny and Yehoshua Birnbaum. Esther remembers the eve of Passover 1945, as her father lay dying, when the Birnbaums baked matza in honor of the Festival of Freedom.

In April 1945, some 2,500 prisoners were forced onto what later became known as "the lost train." Elsa was left behind at Bergen-Belsen, where she died. For weeks, the train traveled back and forth in an attempt to reach Theresienstadt, caught in the crossfire between German and Red Army forces. Close to one quarter of the passengers died during the journey. Early in the morning of 23 April they heard a Russian soldier shout, "Comrades - freedom!" The train was finally liberated next to a destroyed bridge over the Elster River near Troebitz, some 20 km. from Leipzig. In Troebitz, Tzadok and Chana Mossel adopted Josef's children, and the enlarged family returned to Amsterdam in August. In the summer of 1950 Esther's parents' dream was realized when she immigrated with Chana and Tzadok to Israel. Today, Esther is active in commemorating Jews who saved others during the war, as well as saving the forests and hills of Judea.

Esther was married to the late architect Elimelech Reiss, who helped plan Yad Vashem's Children's Memorial. She has three daughters and five grandchildren.

--------------------------------------------

Shimon Greenhouse

Shimon (Sjema) Greenhouse was born in 1932 in Krasna, Belarus, to a traditional Jewish Zionist family. His older siblings, Henya and Mendel, were active in Zionist federations and planned to emigrate to Mandatory Palestine.

At the end of 1941, after the Germans invaded the USSR, Shimon and his family were interned in the Krasna ghetto. Shimon and his mother managed to sneak out of the ghetto and reach a Polish acquaintance who gave them food and convinced an SS officer not to kill them.

One day, after a German horse fell into a pit, the Germans gathered Jews in the ghetto's central square and shot them one by one. Shimon and his father, Yekutiel, stood there, their hands clasped. When Yekutiel was shot, he dragged his young son down with him. Shimon remained beneath his dead father, dazed and covered with blood, for a full day until family members pulled him out.

On Purim (March) 1943, the Germans liquidated the ghetto and murdered its residents, including Mendel and Henya. Shimon and his mother hid for five days with 20 other people. When they emerged, the ghetto was empty, and the air stank of incinerated bodies. As Shimon was recovering from typhus, his mother carried him on her back to the marshes, where the partisans were hiding. They survived the remainder of the war among the partisans, with minimal clothing and food.

After the war, Shimon and his mother returned to Krasna. In 1950, after Shimon completed his studies, they emigrated to Israel. Shimon married and had four children and three grandchildren. He served as an educator and high school principal in Petah Tikva, leaving his mark on generations of students.

Friday 3 April 2009

Rise of atheism: 100,000 Brits seek 'de-baptism'



AFP
March 31


More than 100,000 people have recently downloaded "certificates of de-baptism" from the Internet to renounce their Christian faith.

The initiative launched by a group called the National Secular Society (NSS) follows atheist campaigns here and elsewhere, including a controversial advert displayed on London buses which declared: "There's probably no God."

"We now produce a certificate on parchment and we have sold 1,500 units at three pounds a pop," said NSS president Terry Sanderson, 58.

John Hunt, a 58-year-old from London and one of the first to try to be "de-baptised," held that he was too young to make any decision when he was christened at five months old.

The male nurse said he approached the Church of England to ask it to remove his name. "They said they had sought legal advice and that I should place an announcement in the London Gazette," said Hunt, referring to one of the official journals of record of the government.

So that's what he did -- his notice of renouncement was published in the Gazette in May 2008 and other have followed suit.

Michael Evans, 66, branded baptising children as "a form of child abuse" -- and said that when he complained to the church where he was christened he was told to contact the European Court of Human Rights.

The Church of England said its official position was not to amend its records. "Renouncing baptism is a matter between the individual and God," a Church spokesman told AFP.

"We are not a 'membership' church, and do not keep a running total of the number of baptised people in the Church of England, and such totals do not feature in the statistics that we regularly publish," he added.

De-baptism organisers say the initiative is a response to what they see as increasing stridency from churches -- the latest last week when Pope Benedict XVI stirred global controversy on a trip to AIDS-ravaged Africa by saying condom use could further the spread of the disease.

"The Catholic Church is so politically active at the moment that I think that is where the hostility is coming from," said Sanderson. "In Catholic countries there is a very strong feeling of wanting to punish the church by leaving it."

In the country, where government figures say nearly 72 percent of the population list themselves as Christian, Sanderson feels this "hostility" is fuelling the de-baptism movement.

Theologian Paul Murray at Durham University disagrees. "That is not my experience," he said, but concedes that change is in the air.

"We are in an interesting climate where Catholicism and other belief systems have moved into the public, pluralist arena, alongside secularists," he said.

De-baptism movements have already sprung up in other countries.

In Spain, the high court ruled in favour of a man from Valencia, Manuel Blat, saying that under data protection laws he could have the record of his baptism erased, according to a report in the International Herald Tribune.

Similarly, the Italian Union of Rationalists and Agnostics (UAAR) won a legal battle over the right to file for de-baptism in 2002, according to media reports. The group's website carries a "de-baptism" form to facilitate matters.

According to UAAR secretary Raffaele Carcano, more than 60,000 of these forms have been downloaded in the past four years and continue to be downloaded at a rate of about 2,000 per month. Another 1,000 were downloaded in one day when the group held its first national de-baptism day last October 25.

Elsewhere, an Argentinian secularist movement is running a "Collective Apostasy" campaign, using the slogan "Not in my name" (No en mi nombre).

Sanderson hopes rulings in other European countries will pave the way for legal action in Britain, since European Union directives require a level of parity among member states' legislation.

"That would be a good precedent for us to say to the British Information Commissioner: Come on, what's your excuse?" said Sanderson.

The bus-side posters that hit London in January sported the message: "There's probably no God. Now stop worrying and enjoy your life."

The scheme was in response to pro-Christian adverts on buses directing passers-by to a website warning those who did not accept Jesus would suffer for eternity in hell.

Comedy writer Ariane Sherine, mastermind of the bus campaign that saw a copycat version in Barcelona and other cities, said she backs the "de-baptism" movement but insisted the two initiatives were separate.

Sanderson meanwhile remains resolute. "The fact that people are willing to pay for the parchments shows how seriously they are taking them," he said.